Kun maailma ahdistaa, katselen kuvia avaruudesta. Olemme niin pieniä, ettei meillä tai millään tällä ole oikeasti mitään väliä. Se lohduttaa, rauhoittaa levotonta ajatuksenjuoksuani. Nykyisin yhä useammin huomaan ajattelevani oikeastaan-ei-mitään. Pienet pinnalliset asiat ja epäolennaisuudet kiinnostavat suuria linjoja ja tosiolevaisuutta enemmän.
Teini-ikäisenä murehdin olevani kamalan tavallinen. En koskaan kiinnostunut mistään tarpeeksi intohimoisesti: vähän kaikki kiinnosti, muttei kuitenkaan mikään. En erottanut itseäni, en omia ääriviivojani, mutta silti tunsin oloni yksinäiseksi. Maailma kosketti ja liikutti, mutta elämä tuntui aina vain lipuvan ohitse, kuin seuraisin vierestä, aina vain ihan yksin. Sama meno on jatkunut omalla tavallaan aikuisiälläkin: koen usein olevani hädin tuskin elämässä kiinni, olen selittämättömällä tavalla irtonainen kaikesta, mutta enää en sentään tunne olevani yksinäinen. Tunnen itseni nykyisin paremmin.
Lähes 15 vuotta sitten tutustuin itseeni kunnolla ensimmäistä kertaa, kun kansainvälisen politiikan teorian luennolla Tri Hopgood piirsi taululle vaakatasoon kolme viivaa: ensin alimman viivan, sitten heti sen yläpuolelle toisen, kiemuraisen, ja kolmannen ylös, roimasti ylemmäs kahdesta muusta, kuin puhelinlangan. Alinta viivaa proffa kutsui maailmaksi, todellisuudeksi, jossa elämme. Toista viivaa osoittaessaan hän puhui ihmisistä: suurin osa maailman ihmisistä on tässä, lähellä maailmaa ja todellisuutta. He elävät ja tuntevat. Ylintä viivaa osoittaessaan aloin jo käsittää: "täällä ylhäällä olette te, kansainvälisen politiikan opiskelijat. Te seuraatte, tarkkailette, olette todellisuudesta irrallaan. Teidän kuuluu olla täällä, jotta osaisitte tehdä työnne hyvin." Katselin ympärilleni luentosalissa ja yritin nähdä syvällisen valaistumisen merkkejä muidenkin opiskelijoiden kasvoilla, koska minään toisena hetkenä en ole ymmärtänyt iteäni yhtä täsmällisesti kuin silloin. Hopgood oli kuvaillut suhdettani maailmaan paremmin kuin olisin itse osannut. Olin aina kokenut eläväni varjoissa, katsovani ulkopuolelta muiden menoa, kykenemättä osallistumaan täysillä. Ei se tarkoittanut, ettenkö olisi itse elänyt omaa elämääni, ettenkö iloinnut, rakastanut, kokenut täyttymistä tai yhteyksiä joihinkin toisiin ihmisiin. Olen vain aina ollut vähän elämän reunalla, aina vähän ulkona. Minä olen tarkkailijatyyppi, ja kiitollinen siitä, enkä oikeastaan edes tule ajatelleeksi asiaa nykyisin.
Lähes 15 vuotta sitten tutustuin itseeni kunnolla ensimmäistä kertaa, kun kansainvälisen politiikan teorian luennolla Tri Hopgood piirsi taululle vaakatasoon kolme viivaa: ensin alimman viivan, sitten heti sen yläpuolelle toisen, kiemuraisen, ja kolmannen ylös, roimasti ylemmäs kahdesta muusta, kuin puhelinlangan. Alinta viivaa proffa kutsui maailmaksi, todellisuudeksi, jossa elämme. Toista viivaa osoittaessaan hän puhui ihmisistä: suurin osa maailman ihmisistä on tässä, lähellä maailmaa ja todellisuutta. He elävät ja tuntevat. Ylintä viivaa osoittaessaan aloin jo käsittää: "täällä ylhäällä olette te, kansainvälisen politiikan opiskelijat. Te seuraatte, tarkkailette, olette todellisuudesta irrallaan. Teidän kuuluu olla täällä, jotta osaisitte tehdä työnne hyvin." Katselin ympärilleni luentosalissa ja yritin nähdä syvällisen valaistumisen merkkejä muidenkin opiskelijoiden kasvoilla, koska minään toisena hetkenä en ole ymmärtänyt iteäni yhtä täsmällisesti kuin silloin. Hopgood oli kuvaillut suhdettani maailmaan paremmin kuin olisin itse osannut. Olin aina kokenut eläväni varjoissa, katsovani ulkopuolelta muiden menoa, kykenemättä osallistumaan täysillä. Ei se tarkoittanut, ettenkö olisi itse elänyt omaa elämääni, ettenkö iloinnut, rakastanut, kokenut täyttymistä tai yhteyksiä joihinkin toisiin ihmisiin. Olen vain aina ollut vähän elämän reunalla, aina vähän ulkona. Minä olen tarkkailijatyyppi, ja kiitollinen siitä, enkä oikeastaan edes tule ajatelleeksi asiaa nykyisin.
Mökissä oli kamalan kuuma ja se oli täynnä väkeä. Kotoa olin seuraillut mökin ulkopuolista fiidiä satunnaisesti ja olin huomannut taiteilijoiden teksteissä vilahtelevan samoja nimiä: Eve, Shama, Lotta, Enja-Riina, Ferrari, Samuel ja moni muu. Hesarista olin lukenut, että sama porukka on viettänyt lähes joka päivä mökissä tuntikausia taiteilijoiden kanssa keskustellen, laulaen ja tanssien. Mökissä on 30 päivää kestävän teoksen aikana ystävystytty, avauduttu, opittu paljon itsestä ja ihmisyydestä. Siellä nämä samat ihmiset olivat perjantainakin, ja tunnelma oli performanssin viimeisenä päivänä haikea. Mökissä laulettiin Maamme-laulua, pelleiltiin, arvuuteltiin, luettiin jäähyväis- ja kiitoskirjeitä, kyynelehdittiin. Selkeästi #alonetogether:illa on ollut suuri vaikutus mökissä päivittäin vierailleiden ihmisten elämään.
Minä en tuntenut oloani mökissä pelkästään ulkopuoliseksi kuten aina, mutta yllättäen myös hyvin yksinäiseksi. Vietin mökissä ehkä reilun tunnin, lähinnä kuunnellen vakkarimökkiläisten kevyttä jutustelua taiteilijoiden kanssa. Itse sain sanottua pari sanaa, mutten päässyt osaksi minkäänlaista keskustelua tai ajatustenvaihtoa. Pienen piirin vitsejä sateli samaan malliin kuin bileissä, joissa en tunne ketään eikä ketään todellakaan kiinnosta, olenko paikalla vai en. Kuin olisin tuppautunut taideteokseen, johon minua ei ole kutsuttu; olivat he ja minä. Olen silti tyytyväinen, että menin, näin ja koin. Itse taiteilijat olivat kuin sivuseikka, koska kokemus oli kiinni vakiokävijöistä, joiden tila oli suurempi kuin minun, joiden sydämessä paloi yhteenkuuluvuus ja jotka kokivat teoksen niin totaalisen merkitykselliseksi. Minulle teos oli enemmänkin #togetheralone kuin #alonetogether - en tuntenut yhteen puristautuneen väkijoukon ja taiteilijoiden kanssa mitään yhteistä, vaan tunsin katoavani, häviäväni mökin kuumuuteen. Tunsin syvää yksinäisyyttä muiden ihmisten joukossa, samalla lailla kuin joskus lapsena, kauan sitten. Onneksi minusta ei juuri koskaan tunnu enää samalta kuin silloin joskus, tai niinkuin eilen. Vaikka väreilen elämän reunalla tarkkaillen, minulla on ääriviivat, olen tässä.
When the state of the world makes me anxious, I look at pictures of space. We are so small and insignificant that nothing really matters. I find the thought calming. Inconsistencies and quirks fascinate me more than larger frameworks; I am drawn to small things and their order (or the lack of), but not the meaning of life.
When I was a teenager, I often worried about being ordinary. I was interested in things, but not really, nothing was ever quite interesting enough. In a group of people I couldn't find my own outline, I couldn't quite grasp myself, and yet, I felt like I was always on the outside of the realm of any given social context, alone. I was touched by life and the world, but at the same time I drifted on the sidelines, as if I wasn't really there at all. I have felt the same way as an adult: that I am barely holding onto life, that I am somehow, inexplicably separate from it. I don't feel lonely anymore though - I understand myself better these days.
- - -
When the state of the world makes me anxious, I look at pictures of space. We are so small and insignificant that nothing really matters. I find the thought calming. Inconsistencies and quirks fascinate me more than larger frameworks; I am drawn to small things and their order (or the lack of), but not the meaning of life.
When I was a teenager, I often worried about being ordinary. I was interested in things, but not really, nothing was ever quite interesting enough. In a group of people I couldn't find my own outline, I couldn't quite grasp myself, and yet, I felt like I was always on the outside of the realm of any given social context, alone. I was touched by life and the world, but at the same time I drifted on the sidelines, as if I wasn't really there at all. I have felt the same way as an adult: that I am barely holding onto life, that I am somehow, inexplicably separate from it. I don't feel lonely anymore though - I understand myself better these days.
Almost fifteen years ago I had my first international politics lecture with Dr Hopgood. He drew a diagram on the board: there was a line below, establishing a base line, then a rugged line an inch above it, and way, way higher, a third line, something like a wire that a bird would sit on. He pointed at the base line and said: "This is the world, and this," he continued, pointing at the second line, "is most of the population of the world." "This is you", he said, as his finger reached the highest of the three lines. "You, students of international politics, are here, observing, watching, analysing, detached from the rest. You must be here in order to do what you are meant to do." Nothing before or after that moment has made more sense to me about the way I am, about what I am like as a human being. In a matter of seconds, Dr Hopgood had described the way I felt about the world, all of it: that a lot of the times I felt that I wasn't really living a life at all, but standing in the shadows, looking at the lives of other people. It wasn't anything to feel sad or sorry about, it was just the way things were. That I had always felt somehow disconnected, no matter what had happened in my life at a given time, no matter what I had done, whom I had loved, how my heart had ached. I had been, and still am, always just slightly outside of the frame, always on the edge of life. I am an observer first and foremost, and most times these days, I don't even think about it. I am the way I am, and I am grateful for it.
I thought of Dr Hopgood's lecture on Friday as I was leaving #alonetogether, a performance art piece by artists Shia LeBeouf, Nastja Rönkkö and Luke Turner. The three artists spent 30 days in remote locations in Lapland, each in their own cabin, connected only via webcam to a small wooden cabin inside Kiasma, the Museum of Modern Art in Helsinki. Inside the Kiasma cabin people sat and talked to the artists. The artists' only way of communicating back to the Kiasma cabin was via their keyboard, but the artists had no way of communicating with each other. I had been watching the live feed from Kiasma every now and then at home, with only the outside of the Kiasma cabin showing, and the artists' replies and messages shown on screen. It had been somewhat addicting to follow the cabin life, and on quite a few days I had hopped online, to see what people were talking about in the cabin any given moment. On Friday, the last day of the performance, I decided to take part on the spot.
The cabin was really hot, almost like a steamroom, and packed with people. I had noticed in the online live feed earlier that certain names kept appearing on the screen: Eve, Enja-Riina, Lotta, Shama, Ferrari, Samuel and others, as the artists were addressing them. I had read in the paper that a group of people had made their mission to visit the cabin every day, for hours at a time. The same people were there on Friday as well, and the mood was somewhat somber. It was clear on the last day that the experience had meant the world to these people: a lot of sharing had taken place inside the cabin with the three artists, there had been dancing and games, but also deep conversations. When I was inside, the group sang the Finnish national anthem, chatted with the artists about mostly silly topics, played charades, and read emotional goodbye- and thank you- letters. Some tears were shed, too. It was quite moving.
#alonetogether made me feel lonely, and like a child, almost. The bond between the artists and the everyday visitors had grown to the point where I just felt like I crashed a party I wasn't invited to. The cabin was someone else's, and I didn't feel welcome, although one of the girls in the cabin complimented my trousers - I guess that's something. I didn't really get to participate; mostly I stood there listening to others, and I said a few things which I regretted almost instantly, because artist LeBeouf seemed to think that my question to the artists ("don't you feel in any way exhausted, having to be available to people, interacting with others constantly, even if it is via webcam?") was not worth while ("only when people are lame" or "ask lame questions", he replied). But I am glad I went anyway. It was interesting to see the everyday cabin visitors pour their hearts out to the artists, feeling such deep gratitude for being able to be a part of the performance piece. It was clear that something had stirred in them, that it was something really meaningful to them. It was more about them than the artists. In the cabin, I just felt like I do most times: older, and like an outsider. What was different was the feeling of utter loneliness in a crowd that I used to feel constantly way back when, as a child. I am glad I am not in that place anymore, that I may hover on the edge of life, observing, but I also exist, I have found my outlines.
I thought of Dr Hopgood's lecture on Friday as I was leaving #alonetogether, a performance art piece by artists Shia LeBeouf, Nastja Rönkkö and Luke Turner. The three artists spent 30 days in remote locations in Lapland, each in their own cabin, connected only via webcam to a small wooden cabin inside Kiasma, the Museum of Modern Art in Helsinki. Inside the Kiasma cabin people sat and talked to the artists. The artists' only way of communicating back to the Kiasma cabin was via their keyboard, but the artists had no way of communicating with each other. I had been watching the live feed from Kiasma every now and then at home, with only the outside of the Kiasma cabin showing, and the artists' replies and messages shown on screen. It had been somewhat addicting to follow the cabin life, and on quite a few days I had hopped online, to see what people were talking about in the cabin any given moment. On Friday, the last day of the performance, I decided to take part on the spot.
The cabin was really hot, almost like a steamroom, and packed with people. I had noticed in the online live feed earlier that certain names kept appearing on the screen: Eve, Enja-Riina, Lotta, Shama, Ferrari, Samuel and others, as the artists were addressing them. I had read in the paper that a group of people had made their mission to visit the cabin every day, for hours at a time. The same people were there on Friday as well, and the mood was somewhat somber. It was clear on the last day that the experience had meant the world to these people: a lot of sharing had taken place inside the cabin with the three artists, there had been dancing and games, but also deep conversations. When I was inside, the group sang the Finnish national anthem, chatted with the artists about mostly silly topics, played charades, and read emotional goodbye- and thank you- letters. Some tears were shed, too. It was quite moving.
#alonetogether made me feel lonely, and like a child, almost. The bond between the artists and the everyday visitors had grown to the point where I just felt like I crashed a party I wasn't invited to. The cabin was someone else's, and I didn't feel welcome, although one of the girls in the cabin complimented my trousers - I guess that's something. I didn't really get to participate; mostly I stood there listening to others, and I said a few things which I regretted almost instantly, because artist LeBeouf seemed to think that my question to the artists ("don't you feel in any way exhausted, having to be available to people, interacting with others constantly, even if it is via webcam?") was not worth while ("only when people are lame" or "ask lame questions", he replied). But I am glad I went anyway. It was interesting to see the everyday cabin visitors pour their hearts out to the artists, feeling such deep gratitude for being able to be a part of the performance piece. It was clear that something had stirred in them, that it was something really meaningful to them. It was more about them than the artists. In the cabin, I just felt like I do most times: older, and like an outsider. What was different was the feeling of utter loneliness in a crowd that I used to feel constantly way back when, as a child. I am glad I am not in that place anymore, that I may hover on the edge of life, observing, but I also exist, I have found my outlines.
I had no idea about this exhibition. What is it supposed to speak of? Isolation and connection, I suppose. It does sound like an interesting concept. I have just recently read two books about Polar expeditions (I almost wrote exhibitions there!) with a horror twist and that's all I can think about the isolated cabin in Lapland! But your own perspective on it almost made me cry. I am sorry you have felt on the outskirts of things often. It is not a good feeling for any of us. But I think that maybe the representation of the world as a line and the outside as another line is not entirely fitting. I think that possibly we can think of it as many worlds, as circles, some intersecting, some separate, and while we might be at the outskirts of some, we are at the core of others. Or maybe it is just a healthier way of looking at it. Our cabins are always connected. You're always welcome in mine😊
ReplyDelete(Super rude and thoughtless answer you got, by the way. The lack of maturity makes me cringe so badly, especially when it is obvious that this is the type of thing that our world promotes and celebrates.)
I guess the purpose of this was to address communication in the modern age, and yes, isolation, I think. It was interesting, but very odd. The fanbase in the cabin was unexpected, it brought a whole new twist to the thing.
DeleteI think the 'world as a line' -idea wasn't really a representation of the world as a whole, but as a way of being, a way of thinking that's necessary for students of international politics, like I was back in the day. There is a need to be objective, or to understand one's ideological standing within a more complex whole, in order to make sense of the larger structure. It just happened that the idea also resonated with me as "life" is concerned. I think we all feel like we are outsiders to some extent, I think it is a part of the human experience, to feel alone, but also connected, if just by a thread sometimes. :)
Voi sentään. Kylläpä resonoi... Mietin että paljon samaa, mutta jotain joka on erilaillakin... Ehkä se, että vaikka olen aina tuntenut olevani irrallaan muista, en ole koskaan oikein varsinaisesti tuntenut yksinäisyyden tunnetta. Mitä enemmän erillisyyttä, sitä vahvemmaksi olen kai sitten tuntenut sisäisen maaimani, sitä ehdottomammin ryhtynyt suhtautumaan "muihin"... On toki ollut etenkin nuorena aikuisena jaksoja jolloin olen yrittänyt oppia ryhmäelämisen pelisääntöjä, taipunut tietyllä tavalla, ja saanut siitä palkaksi oikeastaan vain armotonta epävarmuutta ja itseni hukkaamisen tunnetta.. Nyt vanhempana kai sitten olen jo oppinut käyttämään sitä sosiaalisen kanssakäymisen kummaa sääntöviidakkoa silloin kun siitä on itselle hyötyä. Ja muuten sitten kääntynyt vain niitä elollisia kohti joissa on se jotenkin edes sama kaltaisuuden tunne, heimolaisuus. "Alone together" <3
ReplyDeleteJoo, mä olen nuorempana ollut ajoittain hyvinkin yksinäinen, mihin on liittynyt juurikin noita kuvailemiasi ryhmäytymisen yrityksiä. Näin vanhempana on ihan eri tilanne, vaikka ulkopuolisuus onkin edelleen vahvasti läsnä. Tätä taidekokemusta ennen en edes muista, milloin olisin tuntenut oloni yksinäiseksi. :)
DeleteThe more I hear about Shia LaBeouf, the less I like him.
ReplyDeleteTo his defense, I must say that it was quite moving to see him listening to this one young girl, who told the artists what a meaningful experience the cabin had been for her. Tears ran down his face, and he seemed genuinely moved by the girl's words. I also can't be entirely sure if his come-back was targeted at me... another person in the cabin asked him to specify what he meant by lame people and lame questions, and he replied something on the lines of "well people who ask if we eat, or if there is snow in Lapland". The other artists had more interesting responses though: both Rönkkö and Turner mentioned that there was a certain continuous ebb and flow in the interaction, a certain rhythm between deeper conversations and superficial, fun ones, that the constantly changing dialogue kept the experience refreshing.
DeleteWhat a fascinating thinker you are! I can't help thinking that you would absolutely love the Landmark Forum (http://www.landmarkworldwide.com). Sorry -- not meaning to change the subject, here, and I love your blog so much -- you have an amazing sense of style and your writing is always fascinating.
ReplyDeleteWendy
Thank you for your kind words, Wendy! I've never heard of the Landmark Forum, I will make sure to see what it's about. :)
DeleteI keep reading your blog without commenting but this was so achingly beautifully expressed I felt I had to say so. Sometimes I think I was drawn to journalism as a profession because although it seems like we are in the thick of the action, we're merely observers really. It suits my personality.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your lovely comment, lin! Always nice to hear from readers who don't comment often! :) I understand the similarities between journalism and international politics - both fields of study require the ability to observe without engaging.
Delete